We don't have a position description, only an overview:
Collaboration is essential to clinical and translational research. NUCATS Research Navigators are available to facilitate and support collaboration needs at critical points throughout the research lifecycle. They can also direct you to online tools to help maximize successful collaborations.
Research Navigators are opportunity brokers who connect:
* Investigators together to form new research collaborations; and
* Resources of an institution’s research enterprise with external opportunities that support, sustain, extend, and translate collaborative research.
Here're are some of the questions I'm looking to address here at Northwestern:
• How do we define success for a research collaboration/scientific team?;
• How might we effectively measure team science/research collaboration success beyond bibliometric data?;
• Are funded collaborative grants (e.g. NIH U54s) good indicators of success?;
• Is there a source to find successful incentives that have sparked better/more collaboration?;
• What’s a good source of policies related to faculty development and P&T as they relate to team science and collaborations?;
• Can you recommend team science evaluation best/effective practices and/or tools?
Comments
Posted on Jan 05, 2011-11:48am by hfalk
Offline
We don't have a position description, only an overview:
Collaboration is essential to clinical and translational research. NUCATS Research Navigators are available to facilitate and support collaboration needs at critical points throughout the research lifecycle. They can also direct you to online tools to help maximize successful collaborations.
Research Navigators are opportunity brokers who connect:
* Investigators together to form new research collaborations; and * Resources of an institution’s research enterprise with external opportunities that support, sustain, extend, and translate collaborative research.
Posted on Dec 04, 2009-04:41am by hfalk
Offline
Here're are some of the questions I'm looking to address here at Northwestern: • How do we define success for a research collaboration/scientific team?; • How might we effectively measure team science/research collaboration success beyond bibliometric data?; • Are funded collaborative grants (e.g. NIH U54s) good indicators of success?; • Is there a source to find successful incentives that have sparked better/more collaboration?; • What’s a good source of policies related to faculty development and P&T as they relate to team science and collaborations?; • Can you recommend team science evaluation best/effective practices and/or tools?